Does Creatine Actually Work? An Evidence Review
Creatine monohydrate is one of the most-studied dietary supplements in the published literature. We summarise the meta-analyses, effect sizes, the kidney-safety record, and the populations where the evidence is strongest.
Not medical advice
Nutripedia summarises published peer-reviewed research. This content is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Product mentions are not endorsements.
What the Body of Evidence Shows
Our research is based on 83 peer-reviewed studies. View the full evidence database
Our Top Picks
All Picks — Ranked
Frequently Asked Questions
Sources
- ISSN Position Stand: Safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation (2017)
- Effects of Creatine Supplementation on Muscle Strength in Adults <50 (2024)
- Effects of creatine on cognitive function: systematic review (2024)
- Meta-analysis: creatine supplementation and kidney function (2025)
- van der Merwe J et al. — Three weeks of creatine monohydrate supplementation affects dihydrotestosterone to testosterone ratio in college-aged rugby players (2009)
- Regional Muscle Hypertrophy with Creatine: Meta-analysis (2023)
- EFSA scientific opinion on creatine and substantiation of health claims (2011)
- NHS: Creatine — Sports supplements (2023)
- Creapure — Quality and HPLC purity verification (2024)
Nutripedia is an educational resource. Content is sourced from peer-reviewed studies and does not constitute medical advice. Product mentions are not endorsements. Consult a healthcare professional before starting any supplement.
Archie Roberts
Founder, Nutripedia — ALDR Ltd
This page summarises published research from PubMed, NHS, EFSA, and SACN. It does not constitute medical advice; consult a qualified healthcare professional before changing any supplement regimen.