MHRA vs FDA on Supplements: What UK Buyers Should Know
British and American supplements are regulated similarly on paper — both as foods, not medicines — but the detail diverges in places that matter for the UK buyer. We walk through MHRA's, FSA's, and ASA's roles, the FDA's DSHEA framework, the EFSA health claims register, and where the systems overlap or part ways.
Not medical advice
Nutripedia summarises published peer-reviewed research. This content is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Product mentions are not endorsements.
Two Systems, Same Underlying Principle
Our research is based on 12 peer-reviewed studies. View the full evidence database
Our Top Picks
All Picks — Ranked
Frequently Asked Questions
Sources
- Food Standards Agency — Food supplements regulations and guidance (2024)
- MHRA — A guide to what is a medicinal product (Borderline products) (2024)
- MHRA — Yellow Card scheme (2024)
- EU/GB Regulation (EC) 1924/2006 on Nutrition and Health Claims (retained in GB law) (2006)
- Food Supplements (England) Regulations 2003 (2003)
- EFSA — Health claims register and evaluation methodology (2024)
- FDA — Dietary Supplements (DSHEA framework, cGMP, MedWatch) (2024)
- Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA, Public Law 103-417) (1994)
- FTC — Health Products Compliance Guidance (2022)
- ASA — CAP Code rules on health and beauty supplements (2024)
- FSA — CBD novel food guidance and public list (2024)
Nutripedia is an educational resource. Content is sourced from peer-reviewed studies and does not constitute medical advice. Product mentions are not endorsements. Consult a healthcare professional before starting any supplement.
Archie Roberts
Founder, Nutripedia — ALDR Ltd
This page summarises published research from PubMed, NHS, EFSA, and SACN. It does not constitute medical advice; consult a qualified healthcare professional before changing any supplement regimen.