Supplement Testing Standards UK: NSF, Informed Sport, USP, Cologne List, BSCG Compared
MHRA classifies most UK supplements as foods, not medicines. The certification gap that creates is filled by five third-party testing schemes — each with different scopes, frequencies, and athlete-vs-consumer focus. We compare them across identity, potency, contaminants, banned-substance screens, and UK retail availability.
Not medical advice
Nutripedia summarises published peer-reviewed research. This content is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Product mentions are not endorsements.
Why Third-Party Certification Exists in a Food-Regulated Industry
Our research is based on 83 peer-reviewed studies. View the full evidence database
Our Top Picks
All Picks — Ranked
Frequently Asked Questions
Sources
- NSF Certified for Sport — Programme overview and tested-product registry (2024)
- Informed Sport — Programme overview and tested-product database (LGC Group) (2024)
- USP Verified — Dietary Supplements Verification Programme (2024)
- Kölner Liste (Cologne List) — Programme and tested products (2024)
- BSCG Certified Drug Free — Programme overview (2024)
- WADA — World Anti-Doping Code and Prohibited List (2025)
- UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) — Supplements and the Strict Liability principle (2024)
- MHRA — Borderline products: when a supplement becomes a medicine (2024)
- Food Standards Agency — Food supplements regulations (2024)
- Food Supplements (England) Regulations 2003 (2003)
Nutripedia is an educational resource. Content is sourced from peer-reviewed studies and does not constitute medical advice. Product mentions are not endorsements. Consult a healthcare professional before starting any supplement.
Archie Roberts
Founder, Nutripedia — ALDR Ltd
This page summarises published research from PubMed, NHS, EFSA, and SACN. It does not constitute medical advice; consult a qualified healthcare professional before changing any supplement regimen.